Saving encrypted customProperties outside the app?

[Dar Scott]

On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 02:45 PM, Dar Scott wrote:

> The biggest part of that is not the method or the speed, but the 
> logistics of keeping up with signatures and the like to allow users to 
> verify the integrity of the module.  Users will need to depend on the 
> integrity of signers and either their experience and dedication to 
> managing signed code or the review-ability of the code.  To me, this 
> means that initial encryption modules must be in Transcript, but I 
> would consider an external.  Another possibility would be external 
> programs run by shell for some needs.

I change my mind slightly.  There are some memory handling benefits to 
an external.  I would move to the front an external that references a 
signed and well established dll or similar library.

Dar Scott