numbering backgrounds (was: background owners)
dcragg at lacscentre.co.uk
Wed May 21 11:02:01 CDT 2003
At 9:20 am -0600 21/5/03, Dar Scott wrote:
>On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 08:32 AM, Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
>> However, if you want to refer to a background by number (which, of
>> course, you need not do)
>> - do something with background x -
>> you may end up with a background quite different from what you expected,
>> because - this is the point -
>> the *internal* numbering of backgrounds does additionally include all
>> nested backgrounds.
>Does this mean that Dave's cool script to find unplaced backgrounds
>(top level, in your words) does not work?
Darn. Another Eureka moment destroyed. :)
But thanks for the extra info, Wilhelm. It may keep me out of trouble one day.
More information about the use-livecode