functional if (was Special Char Suggestions?)
Richard Gaskin
ambassador at fourthworld.com
Fri May 9 13:51:02 EDT 2003
Dar Scott wrote:
>
> On Friday, May 9, 2003, at 04:56 AM, curry wrote:
>
>> Lately I've been using:
>>
>> function ? x,a,b
>> if x then
>> return a
>> else
>> return b
>> end if
>> end function
>>
>> This is really helping in the project I'm working on.
>
> This can be useful, but it is not as powerful as what I would want. I
> would want the function to be lazy and not evaluate a or b unless
> needed. I think the above function would evaluate both. I would
> normally not have side-effects a or b expressions, so that is not a
> problem, but I would rather not waste the time.
>
> Because of this, this should be a built-in part of the language.
>
> I tend to use a functional style and because of that many--if not
> most--of my function definitions tend to be one command, the return.
> Sometimes that line is continued over several lines. This is not
> always the most readable in transcript; transcript is somewhat
> imperative. (The "put" command reminds us of the implied "you" in
> English.) To make my code more readable I sometimes break out
> subexpressions and name them with "put" commands, perhaps hurting
> performance. If my return "wants" to have an "if", then I break that
> out into preceding code.
>
> I haven't made up my mind on the proposed name. Since function with
> that name will break when/if ?: is added, that may be a reasonable name.
The few libraries I've seen with that call it "iif"
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site
___________________________________________________________
Ambassador at FourthWorld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list