Shuffle

[curry]

>  > (And actually, if you really wanted to be perfect, you might improve 
>  > it by multiplying the number of lines or items by a desired amount for 
>  > your random number parameter, so you have less chance of two lines 
>  > having the same random number and (I assume) remaining in the order 
>  > they originally were in the list.)
>
>Or use some large number?
>
>Dar Scott

Yeah! That's simpler. :-)