Rev 2.02/New pricing

[Alex Rice]

On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 01:10  PM, miscdas at boxfrog.com wrote:

> So, in the single OS versions, do we get a slimmed-down engine 
> optimized for that OS? If we can develop only for one OS, why carry 
> all the unused (and unusable) baggage for the others?

When you need additional engines, the Distribution Builder downloads 
them for you, correct? So I'm unclear what you mean by "unused baggage"?

> Also, I can accept readily all the bugs in a Free version, but they're 
> very hard to swallow in a paid version. (And please, don't tell me 
> what a comparatively small bug count Rev has; it's really irrelevant.)

Hmm... your valuation of runrev's product is: not enough value to pay 
for the entry level version, not enough value to open any bug reports 
in bugzilla, but more than enough value to complain about it on list? I 
think you just want a free version on a silver platter.

I know I'll be buying two Studio licenses when Rev 2.1 comes out. (for 
two different companies).

Alex Rice, Software Developer
Architectural Research Consultants, Inc.
http://ARCplanning.com