RR/MC mixup (was 'Ken's recent bad day')

[Chipp Walters]

I've been following this thread, and agree it's sometimes confusing.

My plugin suite at:
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/RunRev/NewPlugins.htm

Prints to the message box when RR launches the following:

RunRev version: 1.5 A1 r1
MetaCard engine version: 2.4.2
Build Number: 2

it does this with the following function:

on answerVersion
  if exists(stack "revMenuBar") then
    put "RunRev version: " & revAppVersion() & return & "MetaCard engine
version: " & the version & return & "Build Number: " & the buildNumber into
theMsg
  else
    put "MetaCard engine version: " & the version & return & "Build Number:
" & the buildNumber into theMsg
  end if
  put theMsg
end answerVersion


Chipp

> -----Original Message-----
> From: use-revolution-admin at lists.runrev.com
> [mailto:use-revolution-admin at lists.runrev.com]On Behalf Of Ken Norris
> (dialup)
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:22 PM
> To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Subject: Re: RR/MC mixup (was 'Ken's recent bad day')
>
>
> **********
> > From: "Ken Ray" <kray at sonsothunder.com>
> > Subject: Re: Ken's recent bad day.
> > Date:  Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:45:45 -0600
>
> >
> >>> I have not reported this because (a) I am waiting to see whether it
> >>> is fixed in v2.5 and (b) I can work around the problem by making a
> >>> card the current card before trying to access its controls via the AO.
> >> ----------
> >> At least I'm not alone with some anamolies.
> >>
> >> Version 2.5? You mean 2.0 right? Rev hasn't said anything
> about a version
> >> 2.5 AFAIK.
> >
> > I believe Rob was talking about the MetaCard engine under Rev
> 2.0 (which is
> > MetaCard 2.5).
> ----------
> I seem to remember a similar mixup back then as well.
>
> Can we get a definitive list of which RR versions use which MC engines?
>
> Ken N.
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution