pre-beta

[Judy Perry]

Are we all setting up the company for failure or something?  First we have
our favorite resident troll who keeps repeating the v-charge, the company
gives us the pre-beta (to which we're really not entitled not having paid
for one of the pro-licenses) to show the v-charge to be false, and then we
all whine about how buggy/incomplete the pre-beta is.

I haven't taken a look at the latest version but I was pretty happy with
the alpha I saw last November or whenever it was.

What, does v.1 not work?  Think that Maromedia does any better? (HOW long
did Mac users have to wait for an OSX/MX version?!).

And, no, I have not been temporarily possessed...  No need to call out the
exorcists.

:(

Judy

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Bernard Devlin wrote:

> I have been starting to have the same suspicion myself.  It does seem a bit
> strange to have announced 2.0 (along with screenshots) in November.
>
> I know that I bought my license for 1.1.1 on the basis that the release of 2.0
> was imminent.  And a friend who I introduced to Rev has written an application
> that really needs some features in 2.0, and she bought the her 1.1.1 license on
> the basis that 2.0 was imminent.