CPU running hot
Alex Rice
alex at mindlube.com
Mon Dec 29 01:23:03 EST 2003
On Dec 28, 2003, at 6:09 PM, Neville Smythe wrote:
> No sorry Alex, the pulsating button is NOT the problem - that doesn't
> take very much CPU time at all (Apple wouldn't make that mistake,
> which would be entirely unacceptable)
GUI performance on older hardware has been a common complaint since Mac
OS public beta. The throbbing default button is but one of many
potentially resource sucking things in the OS X GUI.
> Check out any dialog box with a pulsating button (well, any of the
> Apple apps, and anything I've written :-)) --- hardly any effect on
> CPU usage.
As a Cocoa programmer I agree with you that the default buttons use
less resources there than in revolution. But it used to be markedly
worse, and has improved with every release of OS X.
> RunRev seems to have a tight loop running in the Find & Replace window
> when something is present in the search field (but not otherwise).
Throbbing default buttons have been a performance issue. At least I was
aware of the issue before being a Revolution programmer at all.
This is the post, probably, I am remembering. Same issue, but having
nothing to do with Revolution:
<http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/archive/macosx-dev/2001-July/
017378.html>
But Tuviah's post suggests Revolution has a sub-optimal way of drawing
buttons/ asking the OS to draw the buttons. (I guess: Runrev does not
do the drawing: it is requesting the OS to draw a pulsating button) Is
it two different issues we are talking about? Maybe the problem I'm
talking about got fixed with 10.1 and the problem you are talking about
is specific to the Find & Replace window. Maybe it's
low-level-event-related and Tuviah is the only one who really
understands it. The latter is my guess.
Alex Rice <alex at mindlube.com> | Mindlube Software |
<http://mindlube.com>
what a waste of thumbs that are opposable
to make machines that are disposable -Ani DiFranco
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list