put into with := ?

Eric Engle engleerica at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 13 18:45:05 CST 2003


in pascal, variable affectation is thus
x := 3;

in xTalk
put 3 into x

Would it be possible to have xTalk adopt 
:=
for affectation? I cannot break myself of the habit of writing
x=3 
which while valid basic or java/script c/++ provokes errors in xTalk.

Thanks!

=====
What I love about spam is realizing how profitable emotional insecurity can be for those who think they're somehow sexually inadequate. I get spam all the time offering to enlarge my breasts and lengthen my penis. And all I can ask is: which first? At least I know once I decide I will have a profitable future as a TV model... 

"To create a new standard takes something that's not just a little bit different. It takes something that's really new and captures people's imaginations. Macintosh meets that standard." -Bill Gates

"Those who would trade liberty for security, deserve neither." - Benjamin
Franklin.
What would _you say to a constitutional amendment to give the president dictatorial powers?
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/nation/6007732.htm

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree


More information about the use-livecode mailing list