Database vs Cards
dvk at dvkconsult.com.au
Mon Oct 14 05:35:00 EDT 2002
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 15:43 Australia/Sydney, Chipp Walters wrote:
> Troy brings up a couple of interesting points:
>> Our applications may have one or two cards in total, probably
>> just due to the way we think about scripting and application
>> But we do store lots of info in the way Richard is describing, and
>> populate a single card with that info on demand. I'm not sure it is
>> right way, or the best way, but it sure works better for us than
>> managing a
>> ton of cards (which I can't get my head around.)
> I myself came from a HyperCard/SuperCard then VB background. And like
> most projects I work on contain only a couple of cards...typically the
> card (the interface) with a second card for graphics used as icons on
> cd 1.
> Only when I create wizards do I use more than one card in a stack. Data
> structures are almost always arrays, custom properties, text
> and/or other single card stacks. Tab controls only show and hide
I'm interested in how others use cards???
Well, I am at a half-way house. I find I have abandoned the old
multiple-background approach with HC in favour of multiple stacks. Data
which I used to stash in a separate background now goes into custom
properties or is built on the fly. However, I am still using a card for
each primary record, complete with prev/next buttons and a modal list
to jump to particular cards. A new record is a new card, partially
populated with defaults from the old one.
I mentioned recently that I have another app to transfer. It contains
about a thousand cards in one background plus other backgrounds for
help information, storing certain lists and summaries and so on.
Planning it, I was groping towards an interface-and-data model (without
wishing to go right to an SQL database, although I have done that
before with an HC front end), so I am finding your comments on this
pretty interesting. Anyone else like to comment on the worth of such a
transition? Or whether I should even go straight to Valentina for
1,000-2,000 records? They are normally accessed individually for single
update rather than reported or modified en masse.
> -Chipp Walters
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 2511 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Use-livecode