Development vs Standalone

[Sarah]

Is the splash screen the main stack or do you have another stack which 
contains all the general handlers but which got bumped down the 
hierarchy when you inserted the splash stack? That's what happened to 
me once when using the splash screen approach. The solution was to have 
an extra line in your splash screen openStack handler:
start using "The stack with all my scripts"

When you do a build like this, my preference is to say "No data folder" 
as well as using "Move substacks..."
If you do this, you will find your application folder includes the 
clickable app as well as a folder called
"My App.rev_components". I find this works better than creating a data 
folder which has this components folder as a sub-folder of it.

Sarah


On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 12:00  pm, Robert Presender wrote:

> Hi,
> I assume that I am doing something wrong.  Will appreciate help.
>
> Using OS 10.2.2/rev 1.1.1r2(OSx)/Emac also OS 9.2.2/rev 1.1.1r2(OS)/PB 
> G3
>
> My project works OK in the development stage but when I do a Build, 
> the standalone doesn't execute properly.
>
> The standalone opens with the Splash, etc but doesn't  want to execute 
> some custom btns both menu and other types on substacks.
>
>  All my substacks appear in the Data folder of the standalone.
>
>  It seems that some btn menus  don't activate their applicable 
> handlers in the Main stack when in Build but do  so when in 
> development.
>
> Selected build options are as follows:
> Basic .. Create folder for substacks, Mac OSX, auto download.....
>
> Stacks .. Current stack file, copy default font and color, remove Rev 
> UI ..., move substacks into indiv files, auto apply stackFiles info to 
> mainStack
>
> Resources.. ask,answer,cursors, icon lib
>
> MacOS option .. only creatpr signature.
>
> TIA
> Regards ... Bob
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>