Use of Transcript and Turtle Graphics in education
jhurley at infostations.com
Wed Dec 11 11:57:01 EST 2002
Erik Hansen wrote:
>to get Turtle Graphics back on the map will
>require standalone teacher-proof teaching
>sequences that capable teachers can extend in
>their own way. i still think TG is the most
>intuitive way to learn geometry and programming
>and look forward to the new release.
>erik at erikhansen.org http://www.erikhansen.org
Ah, a kindred spirit!
I have long had a special interest in using xTalk & TG as means to
teach programing to science students. In 1985 I wrote a short book
(Logo Physics, Holt Rinehart & Winston) hoping to kick start the
It didn't fare very well. I don't think Logo is the right language.
The primary appeal of Logo (a poor man's version of LISP) was TG.
I have translated/revamped that book into a text for High School
students but it exists only as a Word document at the present time.
I am sure Erik is right about the serious roadblocks to putting
x-Talk and TG into the the school curriculum. Most High Schools are
very rigidly institutions.
I have sent a Transcript/TG Demo stack to Heather to post on the Rev
web site. (I hope it goes into the Educators page. I don't think
this will have much appeal to developers. My apologies for taking up
this much space already.) I can also include the Word ms. which might
serve as an open-source text for such a course.
As a physicist, you might imagine that the book is dominated by
physics, and you would be right, but there is some biology and a fair
bit of mathematics.
Emeritus Prof. of Physics, Univ. of Calif.
More information about the Use-livecode