send ___ to me in ___ sec

[Dave Cragg]

At 10:00 am -0500 24/4/02, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>Dave Cragg <dcragg at lacscentre.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>  Using the "in <time>" extension to the send command will cause the
>>currently running handler to complete before the "called" handler
>>is run.
>
>I see. So in the original poster's question, the script could "send
>in 0 milliseconds" within the deleteCard handler and it would always
>run after the card was deleted -- yes?
>

In the words of the social scientists, it depends what you mean by "always". :)

If the handler for the sent message is on the deleted card, then how 
does it run if the card has been deleted?

I guess there's only one way to find out, but I'll leave that for someone else.

(And apologies to the original poster. I didn't pay full attention to 
your original mail.)


Cheers
Dave Cragg