MC IDE 2.6 - next steps

[Ray G. Miller]

>
>
>From: Richard Gaskin <ambassador at fourthworld.com>
>Subject: Re: RE: MC IDE 2.6 - next steps
>  
>

>Dr.John R.Vokey wrote:
>  
>
>>>Should I proceed with a change from opening as toplevel to simply
>>>opening in the stack's native mode?
>>>      
>>>
>>No; retain the original behaviour of 14 years.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>What do you think is most appropriate option for an IDE with 28 users?
>>>      
>>>
>>There are a lot more than 28 MC IDE users; I know of 4 beside myself who 
>>use the MC IDE exclusively, and none of them belongs to this list (they 
>>rely on me to keep the up-to-date).
>>    
>>

The Great Poobah wrote:

>Thank you for posting.  The feedback is critical.
>
>Hmmm.... I wish there was a way we could give you four votes in the IDE 
>usage poll.  It's very helpful in understanding the scope of what we 
>need to do.
>  
>

Ok, do it! You have the wisdom and the power (as invested by just being 
the Great Poobah!).

When we were doing beta testing we gave certain testers more weight than 
others. There ain't no democracy when it comes to beta testing.

I also vote to keep the original behavior.
Ray

Ray G. Miller
__________________
Turtlelips Productions
4009 Everett Ave.
Oakland, CA 94602
MailTo:rgmiller at pacbell.net
(V) 510.530.1971
(F) 510.482.3491


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/metacard/attachments/20040528/6da9df95/attachment.htm