MC IDE

[J. Landman Gay]

On 8/24/03 5:49 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote:

> On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 03:02  PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
> 
>> I would guess Richard just meant the docs stack/s, not the whole
>> environment...
> 
> 
> I'm questioning whether the Rev doc stacks would go willingly -- whether 
> they have dependencies on the Rev environment that would require 
> correcting before they'd run standalone in MC.

They have dependencies. The Rev docs were so superior to the MC docs 
that I had them wired into my copy of MC for a while when Rev 1.0 came 
out. But soon after that, they became highly dependent on the Rev prefs 
stack. It was too much trouble to resolve the dependencies so I stopped 
doing it. I'm sure it could be done, I just didn't pursue it.

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com