Arrays and Matrix Algebra

[Dr. Wolfgang Rost]

am 14.03.2002 17:51 Uhr schrieb Gregory Lypny unter
gregory.lypny at videotron.ca:

> Hi Everyone,
> 
> Just wanted to confirm the correct way to set up arrays to be able
> to do matrix math.  If I have an array named X, does MetaCard treat
> x[3,4] as the fourth element in the third row of X and x[8,2] as the
> second element in the eigth row?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Gregory Lypny
> Associate Professor
> Concordia University
> ____________________________________________________________
> "They had the best selection,
> The were poisoned by protection,
> There was nothing that they needed,
> They had nothing left to find."
> - Neil Young
> 
> 
> E-mail forum:   markets at concordia.ca
> Visit Pareto at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca
> Visit Borsa at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca/Borsa_Classroom
> Crash site for notes and quizzes at
> http://homepage.mac.com/gregorylypny/FileSharing1.html
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> metacard mailing list
> metacard at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
Hi Greg,

I think so, but the worse (sorry, my English is very poor, I'm a German, or
so?) is, that, how Scott me just mailed, you can't adress row's and column's
in array's. So I think, a 2-dimensional array brings no advantage and must
just be handled like a 1-dimensional one. Is it right?

Regards

       Wolfgang

Dr. Wolfgang Rost, Psychologist and Software-Developer, Germany